How Reg & Cert can represent assessment progress
At a high level, the qualification record acts as the container for tracking an assessment or assessment stage, while the associated assessment records provide the attempt-level detail.
A typical mapping looks like this:
Qualification record = the overall programme assessment, EPA, or a specific assessment component
Qualification status = where the learner is in the assessment lifecycle
Planned Achieved Date = intended completion date for the assessment or stage
Achieved Date = actual completion or pass date
Registration Number = awarding body or EPAO registration identifier, where relevant
Assessment records = individual assessment events such as attempts, mocks, resits or results
This means providers can use the same core structure for both broader programme assessments and formal EPA tracking.
Example configuration approaches
Providers can configure qualification tokens in different ways depending on how much detail they want to capture.
Option 1: Single overall assessment qualification
Use a single qualification to represent the full assessment journey, for example:
Programme Assessment – OverallSingle Overall Registration
Go to Qualifications in Programme Builder and add either a text based Qualifications or use the LARS number, if text is entered it will use the text , if a number is used it will look in the LARS database, example shown below:
This approach supports simpler reporting and is often the best starting point.
It can be used to track:
pre-assessment planning
readiness or gateway completion
registration with an awarding body or EPAO
overall assessment outcome
certification claim, receipt and issue stages
Option 2: Separate qualifications for assessment components
Use multiple qualifications to represent individual components, for example:
Go to Qualifications in Programme Builder and add text to break down different type of Assessments
[Prefix] Assessment – Knowledge Test[Prefix] Assessment – Observation[Prefix] Assessment – Professional Discussion[Prefix] Assessment – Overall Outcome
For EPA, a consistent prefix is recommended to support clearer filtering and reporting.
This model gives greater visibility where providers need to:
report on each component separately
manage resits or multiple attempts
support more detailed quality assurance
distinguish between component outcomes and overall result
Option 3: Internal or bespoke assessment stages
Providers can also use Reg & Cert for internal or non-regulated stages, for example:
gateway sign-off
internal readiness panel
mock assessment events
employer review before formal registration
programme review points
This can be useful where providers want a single approach to tracking both formal and internal assessment activity.
Typical qualification status usage
Qualification statuses can be used to reflect the learner’s progress through the assessment lifecycle.
A typical pattern might be:
Not Registered – learner is not yet registered for the assessment
Registered – learner is registered with the awarding body or EPAO
Ready / Gateway Reached – learner has completed the required preparation stage
Achieved – learner has successfully completed the assessment
Certificate Claimed – result confirmed and claim submitted
Certificate Received – certificate received by the provider
Certificate Sent – certificate issued to the learner or employer
For EPA delivery, some providers may use:
Not Registered – learner is not yet registered with the EPAO
Registered – learner is registered with the EPAO, often in line with the six-month funding requirement rather than at gateway
Gateway Reached or equivalent local convention – learner has completed gateway requirements
In this model, Registration & Certification provides a clear operational view of where each learner is in the assessment journey.
How tutors and administrators update assessment information
Once the qualifications are configured on the programme, tutors and administrators can update assessment progress directly in Console.
Updating qualification-level milestones
The qualification record is used to maintain the main lifecycle details, for example:
updating status from Not Registered to Registered
entering the Registration Date
entering the Registration Number
updating the Achieved Date
progressing certificate-related statuses after completion
This is typically the responsibility of exams, EPA or administrative teams, although tutors may also update some fields depending on local processes.
Updating assessment-level activity
Assessment records are used to capture attempt-level detail, such as:
gateway sign-off event
assessment attempt 1
resit attempt
mock assessment
final overall result
For each assessment record, staff can typically record:
assessment date
status
result
grade
This allows providers to record both progress and outcome, rather than only the final certification stage.
Typical operational split
A common operating model is:
Tutors or coaches update mock assessments, readiness checks and provisional outcomes
EPA, exams or administrative teams maintain official registrations, confirmed results and certificate lifecycle stages
MIS or data teams use the resulting qualification and assessment data for reporting and oversight
Configuration considerations
The following points should be considered when setting up Reg & Cert for programme assessments or EPA tracking.
Existing learners on programme
For existing learners already on programme, the qualifications token will not automatically update if a new qualification configuration is introduced.
Where providers need to apply a revised qualification structure to existing learners, a sub-programme can be used and attached to those learners.
Using sub-programmes
Sub-programmes can be used:
only for existing learners where a revised structure is needed, or
for all learners, where providers want a more consistent and flexible way to manage assessment-related qualifications separately from the main programme structure
This can be particularly useful where assessment configuration may evolve over time.
Permissions
The Registration and Certification permission only controls whether administrators and tutors can see the side menu option for the Reg & Cert report.
It does not control whether they can update Registration & Certification fields within the learner profile.
Providers should therefore review role permissions carefully and make sure operational responsibilities are supported by the correct access model.
Export permissions
The Data Export permission is required to export data directly from the Reg & Cert menu.
This export provides single-line data only.
Where providers need more detailed or historical-style reporting, other reporting routes may be more suitable.
Reporting on programme assessments and EPA
Providers can report on assessment progress using both Aptem’s in-system views and external reporting tools.
In-system reporting
The Qualifications grid can be used to monitor:
learners with assessment qualifications in Not Registered status
learners registered for assessment or EPA
learners at certificate claimed, received or sent stages
planned and achieved dates for assessment-related qualifications
The Assessments grid can be used to monitor:
component attempts
failed assessments requiring resit
assessments awaiting grade or confirmation
outcomes by qualification, date, result or grade
This is often sufficient for day-to-day operational management.
OData reporting
For more detailed reporting, providers can use OData and BI tools such as Power BI.
Multi-line data is available in the following OData tables:
AwardingBodyQualificationsAwardingBodyQualificationsAssessmentHistory
These can support reporting on:
assessment readiness pipelines
learners due for assessment or EPA
component-level success and resit rates
overall outcomes
achievement rates by programme, standard, employer or cohort
CSV exports
There is also a CSV option for Qualifications and Assessments that providers may choose to use.
This may be useful in some scenarios, but it should be used with care. Providers should ensure they understand:
what data is included
how frequently it is refreshed
whether the format meets their reporting requirements
any limitations around manual handling or interpretation
It may be helpful to provide a separate article covering CSV export use, good practice and cautions in more detail.
Example usage scenarios
Example 1: Simple overall assessment tracking
A provider wants a straightforward way to track who is due for assessment, who has been registered, and who has achieved.
Configuration
Add one qualification to the programme, for example
Programme Assessment – OverallSet assessment level at qualification level
Use assessment records to capture result events where needed
Usage
at enrolment: status = Not Registered
before assessment: set Planned Achieved Date to the target month
when registered: update status and add registration details where relevant
after completion: add an assessment record for the result, then populate Achieved Date and progress certificate stages if required
Best for
providers that want minimal setup
operational pipeline tracking
overall outcome reporting
Example 2: Component-level assessment tracking
A provider needs visibility of each component and resit activity.
Configuration
Add multiple qualifications, such as:
Assessment – Knowledge TestAssessment – Professional DiscussionAssessment – ObservationAssessment – Overall Outcome
Usage
each qualification tracks the status and dates for that component
assessment records capture each attempt, including resits
the overall outcome can be tracked separately if required
Best for
providers with detailed quality assurance requirements
component-level reporting
resit management
programmes with distinct assessment parts
Example 3: Internal readiness and gateway tracking
A provider wants to track readiness stages before a formal assessment or EPA registration.
Configuration
use a qualification or assessment records to represent internal readiness checks, mock assessments or gateway sign-off
combine this with the main assessment or EPA qualification record for the formal lifecycle
Usage
tutors record readiness activity in assessments
once the learner is ready, administrative teams update the main qualification to Registered
reporting can then distinguish between learners approaching assessment and learners already in it
Best for
providers that want early visibility of assessment pipeline risk
teams that separate readiness activity from formal registration
EPA or gateway-led delivery models
Key limitations and considerations
Providers should be aware of the following when designing assessment tracking in Reg & Cert.
1. Status coverage is generic, not assessment-specific
Reg & Cert status values are designed to support qualification lifecycle tracking broadly. Some assessment-specific scenarios may not have dedicated statuses, such as:
deferred
extended
partially achieved
void due to malpractice
no attempt
Where this applies, providers should define and document consistent local conventions.
2. Historical reporting is limited
Reg & Cert and OData reflect the current state of data. They do not natively provide point-in-time snapshots for historic reporting, such as year-end or funding return positions.
Providers that need audit-grade historic reporting should plan to take external snapshots or use a data warehouse approach.
3. Export routes serve different needs
Direct export from the Reg & Cert menu is limited to single-line export data and requires the Data Export permission.
Where providers need more detailed or multi-line reporting, they should consider:
OData
CSV options for Qualifications and Assessments
external BI tools
4. Programme design should remain as simple as possible
It is technically possible to create detailed qualification and assessment structures, but over-complicating the design can make it harder to maintain, train staff on, and report against.
In most cases, providers should start with the simplest model that answers their operational questions.
5. Existing learner setup may need separate handling
Where assessment-related qualifications are introduced or changed after learners are already on programme, providers should plan for how those learners will be brought into the updated structure.
Using a sub-programme is one way to do this.
6. Package access may vary
Reg & Cert and some reporting capabilities may depend on the provider’s Aptem package, permissions or additional modules.
Recommended approach
For most providers, the recommended approach is to:
decide whether overall-only tracking or component-level tracking is genuinely needed
configure assessment-related qualifications on the programme in a clear and consistent way
use qualification records for lifecycle milestones such as readiness, registration and certification
use assessment records for attempts, outcomes and resits
decide how existing learners will be handled if new qualification structures are introduced
keep naming conventions and prefixes consistent to support reporting
build reporting around the key operational questions the provider needs to answer
document any local conventions for unsupported statuses or special scenarios